Flow metrics: Difference between revisions

From Delft Solutions
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
* Example: If $100,000 worth of products sits in warehouse for 30 days, this creates 3,000,000 inventory-dollar-days
* Example: If $100,000 worth of products sits in warehouse for 30 days, this creates 3,000,000 inventory-dollar-days
* Lower IDD indicates higher effectiveness. The ultimate goal would be 0 IDD.  
* Lower IDD indicates higher effectiveness. The ultimate goal would be 0 IDD.  
===A sidenote on quality===
We don't measure quality separately from Effectiveness, Reliability or Throughput. Quality is inherently integrated into the three measurements:
* Sales are only recognized after customer acceptance.
* Inventory reductions are only counted once items are deployed to production.


Like almost all lean thinking, you can only deliver quality products. Badly engineered products or bad testing is so antithetical to lean thinking, that none of the metrics will work correctly if you start reducing quality.  
Like almost all lean thinking, you can only deliver quality products. Badly engineered products or bad testing is so antithetical to lean thinking, that none of the metrics will work correctly if you start reducing quality.  
Line 32: Line 27:
Throughput-Dollar-Days are very similar to Inventory-Dollar-Days, with the key difference being the 'clock' on IED starts running from the moment you work on the project. TED starts from the expected delivery date or deadline of the project.  
Throughput-Dollar-Days are very similar to Inventory-Dollar-Days, with the key difference being the 'clock' on IED starts running from the moment you work on the project. TED starts from the expected delivery date or deadline of the project.  


===Key Characteristics===
* Incorporates both time and monetary value
* Incorporates both time and monetary value
* Provides more meaningful insights than simple percentage-based metrics
* Provides more meaningful insights than simple percentage-based metrics
Line 40: Line 34:
Throughput represents the rate at which the system generates goal units (typically money) through sales. We count all money arriving in the bank (cash flow model) paid by our clients. We don't consider invoices sent out as throughput because we, as a team, are also responsible for ensuring that the invoices get paid. Our work doesn't stop when the invoice has been sent.  
Throughput represents the rate at which the system generates goal units (typically money) through sales. We count all money arriving in the bank (cash flow model) paid by our clients. We don't consider invoices sent out as throughput because we, as a team, are also responsible for ensuring that the invoices get paid. Our work doesn't stop when the invoice has been sent.  


===Measurement===
Revenue is measured in euros. We track three key values in the Metrics sheet:  
Revenue is measured in euros. We track three key values in the Metrics sheet:  


Line 48: Line 41:


These all measure the same, but we don't get invoices paid daily. Effectiveness and Reliability go up and down each day in semi-predictable amounts because they mostly directly result from the work you're doing and not doing as a team. Revenue requires work by third parties (customers and banks) and is much more lump-sum. We track revenue per quarter and average trailing four quarters as those graphs smooth the numbers to such an extent that visual analysis is much easier.  
These all measure the same, but we don't get invoices paid daily. Effectiveness and Reliability go up and down each day in semi-predictable amounts because they mostly directly result from the work you're doing and not doing as a team. Revenue requires work by third parties (customers and banks) and is much more lump-sum. We track revenue per quarter and average trailing four quarters as those graphs smooth the numbers to such an extent that visual analysis is much easier.  
==A sidenote on quality==
We don't measure quality separately from Effectiveness, Reliability or Throughput. Quality is inherently integrated into the three measurements:
* Sales are only recognized after customer acceptance.
* Inventory reductions are only counted once items are deployed to production.


=Relationship Between Metrics=
=Relationship Between Metrics=

Revision as of 06:26, 3 February 2025

Key Performance Metrics at Delft Solutions

Delft Solutions utilizes three fundamental metrics to measure and improve business performance: Effectiveness, Reliability, and Throughput. These metrics work in concert to provide a comprehensive view of operational excellence.

Effectiveness

Effectiveness measures actions that should not have been done but were nevertheless performed. That can be a little hard to grasp because "should not have been done" usually means "should not have been done YET". Essentially, it's work we could have done later but didn't.

Effectiveness doesn't measure overpolishing (work that is being done too well, compared to what we or the customers need) but WIP: work in progress. Work that has been completed; is ready to be delivered to the customer, but it hasn't been delivered yet.

Inventory-Euro-Days (IED) Effectiveness is calculated in Inventory Dollar-Days.

  • Calculated as: Dollar value of inventory × Number of days held
  • Example: If $100,000 worth of products sits in warehouse for 30 days, this creates 3,000,000 inventory-dollar-days
  • Lower IDD indicates higher effectiveness. The ultimate goal would be 0 IDD.

Like almost all lean thinking, you can only deliver quality products. Badly engineered products or bad testing is so antithetical to lean thinking, that none of the metrics will work correctly if you start reducing quality.

Reliability

Reliability measures commitments fulfilled to the external world, particularly focusing on timely delivery.

Throughput-Euro-Days (TED)

  • Calculated as: Value of late orders × Number of days late
  • Example: A $50,000 order delivered 5 days late results in 250,000 throughput-dollar-days
  • Lower TDD indicates higher reliability. The ultimate goal here too, is 0.

Throughput-Dollar-Days are very similar to Inventory-Dollar-Days, with the key difference being the 'clock' on IED starts running from the moment you work on the project. TED starts from the expected delivery date or deadline of the project.

  • Incorporates both time and monetary value
  • Provides more meaningful insights than simple percentage-based metrics
  • Encourages focus on high-value customer commitments

Throughput

Throughput represents the rate at which the system generates goal units (typically money) through sales. We count all money arriving in the bank (cash flow model) paid by our clients. We don't consider invoices sent out as throughput because we, as a team, are also responsible for ensuring that the invoices get paid. Our work doesn't stop when the invoice has been sent.

Revenue is measured in euros. We track three key values in the Metrics sheet:

  • Revenue per day.
  • Revenue per quarter
  • Average revenue, trailing four quarters.

These all measure the same, but we don't get invoices paid daily. Effectiveness and Reliability go up and down each day in semi-predictable amounts because they mostly directly result from the work you're doing and not doing as a team. Revenue requires work by third parties (customers and banks) and is much more lump-sum. We track revenue per quarter and average trailing four quarters as those graphs smooth the numbers to such an extent that visual analysis is much easier.

A sidenote on quality

We don't measure quality separately from Effectiveness, Reliability or Throughput. Quality is inherently integrated into the three measurements:

  • Sales are only recognized after customer acceptance.
  • Inventory reductions are only counted once items are deployed to production.

Relationship Between Metrics

These three metrics are interconnected:

  • High effectiveness (low IDD) supports better throughput by reducing waste
  • Strong reliability (low TDD) enables consistent delivery and higher customer satisfaction.
  • Improved throughput often requires balancing effectiveness and reliability

See Also

Other related terms that might be of interest:

  • Theory of Constraints
  • Operational Excellence
  • Performance Measurement Systems

Further reading